How Muslim countries must deal with radicals
Don't oppress them. Out-compete them on services – and save democracy.
By Abu Khawla
The Islamist Muslim Brotherhood is gaining undeniable popularity. It's doing so by exploiting democratic methods. That poses an existential problem for the future of democracy in the Arab world.
To legitimize the movement – the main representative of political Islam – runs the risk of succumbing to fanatics opposed to democracy. To outlaw it may lead to its further radicalization. But there's a way Muslim governments can avoid this Catch-22: They can contain the Islamist threat without harming budding democracies by undermining the Brotherhood with educational, social, and economic reforms.
The Brotherhood now holds 88 of 444 seats in the Egyptian
parliament. In 2006, the Islamic Action Front, the political wing of the
Brotherhood, won 23 out of 80 seats in the Jordanian parliament. Islamists are
making similar gains in
Believing that Islamists are actually committed to democracy based on their participation in elections is like judging Adolf Hitler in 1933 based on his acceptance of the ballot box, not on what he wrote in "Mein Kampf."
The writings of the Muslim Brotherhood's founder, Hasan al Banna, were clear on the movement's main objective of implementing God's rule on earth. His view leaves no room for democratic decisions based on majority vote.
The use of violence was justified in unequivocal terms by Banna when he addressed the movement's fifth congress in 1939. And Islamist use of violence throughout the past three decades proves that Banna's teachings did not fall on deaf ears.
Yet, despite this violent pedigree, some observers insist
that the movement is the exception and not the rule. Leading Arab democracy
advocate Saad Eddin Ibrahim, for example, claims only in three cases (
The exceptions Dr. Ibrahim cites don't suggest that the
Brotherhood is generally committed to democracy. Instead they show that the
movement will adopt whatever means are necessary to advance its fundamentalist
idelogy. Why stage a violent coup if a ballot box achieves the same result?
Indeed, the violent seizure of the Gaza Strip in 2006 by Hamas – the
The Arab Islamist movements' main obsession nowadays seems to be to oppose democratic values. The Muslim Brotherhood's agenda, recently posted on the Internet, was clear in this respect when it stated that both the president and the elected legislative council should be advised by a "supreme council of clerics" whose decisions "will be final." And to add insult to injury, non-Muslims and women are barred from the presidency.
It is worth noting that Islamist success in places like
With these fascistic features of "Islamic democracy," no wonder the Islamists resort to bloody means to grab power. And no wonder they fail to deliver when faced with real-world challenges.
As the Islamists gain popularity and threaten democracy throughout the Arab world, lessons from a handful of Muslim countries show that repression isn't the solution.
A new lesson came from the Muslim world's largest country,
For Washington, and the international community, the lesson
is clear: Instead of supporting failed autocracies in the
Abu Khawla is a human rights activist and writer.
from the April 08, 2009 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0414/p09s01-coop.html
Please report any
broken links to
Copyright © 1988-2012 irfi.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer