The Real Attack on the Bill of Rights
The First Amendment is Under Siege
posted on Tuesday, April 14, 2009 4:30 PMBy Jonathan
Selected excerpts interspersed with my comments.
A dangerous attack on the American Bill of Rights has begun to show up on right wing blogs.
In February of '07, Pedestrian Infidel proposed a 28th Amendment to the Constitution. I believe that blog post to be the first such concrete proposal I encountered on the web. Others had suggested a need for legislation, some had suggested the need for an amendment, but, to the best of my knowledge, there were no concrete proposals. Concern about Islam's threat to our liberties dates back more than two years, it is not a novelty.
The proposed amendment is a counter attack against Islamic supremacism, not an attack against the Bill of Rights. An outline of the proposal follows.
Islam is not recognized as a religion, it is stripped of First Amendment protection.
Declares Islam an enemy of the
Muslim institutions are to be closed and propagation of Islam prohibited. Muslim immigration is terminated.
Discrimination, assault & impairment of individual rights (as limited by Art. 3) of Muslims prohibited.
The threat to liberty issues from Islam, not from 'Islamophobes'.
Islam denies freedom of conscience.
3:2. All‚h! L‚ ilah‚ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that exists.
3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Isl‚m, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that All‚h is with those who are the Al-MuttaqŻn (the pious - see V.2:2).
Islam denies freedom of speech.
O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam [If you leave Islam, you must be executed: O8.1 -.2]
-3- to speak words that imply unbelief
-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);
-5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);
-6- to be sarcastic about Allah's name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;
-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;
-16- to revile the religion of Islam;
-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;
-20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet's message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala'iyya (y4), 423-24). )
Islam denies freedom of religion.
O11.5 Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:
-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
-4- must keep to the side of the street;
-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.
Source:: Umdat as-Salik, the hand book of Islamic law.
Allah's word is law, once Allah and Moe have decided a matter, there is no right to question their decision and no appeal.
Concerning proposals to write Islam out of the First Amendment, deport Muslims and close Islamic institutions, Jonathan responds: " These attitudes are intolerable." Either Jonathan's value system varies greatly from ours or he perceives Islam through a fact filter that prevents him from perceiving Islam's intolerance & violence, which make it intolerable to lovers of life and liberty.
Allah's word must be "made superior", as specified in 9:33 and 48:28. Supremacism & triumphalism are interwoven throughout Islam's canon of scripture. This fatal fact becomes clear when one reads the titles of related topics in Ibn Kathir's Tafsir.
The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book
The Good News that Islam shall prevail
How will Islam conquer us? By Jihad: "Holy fighting in
Allah's cause, "ordained" for Muslims,. as the price of admission to
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," precludes our government from discriminating against any religions. What could be a worse discrimination against a specific belief system than to legislate that it doesn't "qualify" as a religion at all.
The establishment clause precludes establishing a national church. The founders wisely decided against allowing the government to decide which church, if any, we will join.
The worst course of action is that which has been followed for the last 220 years, giving a piracy cult undeserved constitutional protection. Islam has theology, cosmology, prayer, ritual & charity and it binds men permanently to Allah, so it must be a legitimate religion, right? Wrong! Islam has a mercenary mission! When reading a book one third as long as the Bible, it is difficult to perceive certain patterns. Isolating a few critically important ayat makes the pattern perceptible by removing the chaff which otherwise occludes the pattern.
8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad) about the spoils of war. Say: "The spoils are for All‚h and the Messenger." So fear All‚h and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey All‚h and His Messenger (Muhammad), if you are believers.
8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to All‚h, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Mas‚kin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in All‚h and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) - And All‚h is Able to do all things.
8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but All‚h desires (for you) the Hereafter. And All‚h is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
48:19. And abundant spoils that they will capture. And All‚h is Ever All-Mighty, All-Wise.
Who gets the spoils? Allah and his Messenger, who takes the
top 20% with right of first selection. Since Allah is an impotent idol, Moe got
the best of the loot. What did Moe want? "the good of this world" .
What does Allah want? "great slaughter"! Making a great slaughter was
the price of Moe's ticket to
The clear pattern formed by the ayat cited above is confirmed and reinforced by several of the oral traditions of Moe's companions.
Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.
Muslim Book 019, Number 4294 [...]Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils [...]
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495 [...]When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, [...]
Allah made spoils lawful for Moe because of his weakness and humility. Allah gave Moe the keys to the treasures of the world. Allah allocated the spoils to Moe, who kept the top 20% for himself.
How did Allah make Moe victorious? How did Allah make Moe wealthy? Is it possible that Moe was an arrogant, belligerent narcissist, unworthy & unqualified to be a Prophet? Aisha Bewley translated part of Sahih Bukhari which Khan Bowdlerized.
Bukhari Ch 61 # 2756: ...It is mentioned from Ibn 'Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, "My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.
Those are the words of a pirate, not a Prophet. Moe founded a piracy cult, which wears a false mantle of religion as a camouflage and motivational tool. What legitimate religion says 'go to war or go to Hell'?
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and All‚h is Able to do all things.
9:90. And those who made excuses from the bedouins came (to you, O Prophet ) asking your permission to exempt them (from the battle), and those who had lied to All‚h and His Messenger sat at home (without asking the permission for it); a painful torment will seize those of them who disbelieve.
Those clear and obvious ayat are confirmed by an equally clear hadith.
Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2497:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: He who does not join the warlike expedition (jihad), or equip, or looks well after a warrior's family when he is away, will be smitten by Allah with a sudden calamity. Yazid ibn Abdu Rabbihi said in his tradition: 'before the Day of Resurrection".
We have a responsibility to judge individuals by their actions, not by the books they read.
We are judging an institution, not individuals. We must judge it by its doctrines and its fruits. What legitimate religion sanctifies aggressive conquest, genocide & terrorism ? What legitimate religion enslaves people?
O9.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman's previous marriage is immediately annulled.
Whatever any of us believe about the tenets of the Muslim faith, it isn't anyone's place to judge their neighbor's religious beliefs, and American citizens who are Muslim are entitled to the same constitutional protections as any other American - including the practice of their religion, and obviously, not being deported. This paranoia reminds me of America's imprisoning 70,000 United States citizens during World War II - among a total of 117,000 of Japanese descent who were detained in so-called "relocation centers." Haven't we grown up since then?
What we believe about the tenets of Islam is irrelevant. The
reality is relevant, and it is evident on the face of the Qur'an, hadith,
tafsir & Shari'ah, which form a congruent pattern of violent, genocidal
aggression. In a state of weakness, with numerical inferiority, Islam is
relatively docile. As its numbers increase, it becomes increasingly aggressive.
In Mekkah, vastly outnumbered, Moe preached forbearance. In
A 1400 year death toll of 270 million tells us that
objection to Islam is not paranoia. Muslims form a fifth column on our own
soil. Trusting them is not possible. A bullet or bomb can come from any
direction at any time, as thirteen victims discovered in the metropolitan
What's the point of this post? Simply that people will always be people. Whether they read books with messages of peace or books that endorse wrath and vengeance, most people are usually peaceful, but circumstances sometimes push people to violence, and a few people will always be obsessively addicted to violence.
Most Muslims do not read the Qur'an, the last statistic I
saw showed a Qur'an literacy rate of 17% among men and 13% among women. They
get their ideals from the Mosque, and most Mosques in
If we were to discriminate against Muslims, who's next,
Scientologists? Jehovah's Witnesses? Mormons? Japanese? I'm saddened when
fundamentalists of any faith advocate wrath and vengeance, but I support
everyone's right to their books, their beliefs, and all their rights as
While Jonathan accuses Islam's critics of paranoia, his penultimate paragraph is a clear example of paranoia. Why should anyone be next? Do they worship a blood thirsty demon who demands human sacrifice? Do they make sacraments of conquest, genocide & terrorism? Do they constitute a security threat? Are their doctrines inimical to liberty? Do they demand that their scripture be substituted for our Constitution?
Posted by Ben at 8:16 PM††
Labels: Hadith, Islam, Qur'an, Shari'ah
Please report any
broken links to
Copyright © 1988-2012 irfi.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer