Victims Of India's 'War On Terror'
By Yoginder Sikand
11 September, 2008
In a development of far-reaching and frightening
implications for the stature of the Indian judiciary, Bar Associations in
several parts of the country are effectively banning advocates from defending
Muslim youth branded as 'terrorists', many of them who may well be wrongly
accused. A chilling indicator of how deeply-rooted anti-Muslim prejudice has
The Bar Association of Dhar, a small town in Madhya Pradesh, is a case in
point. Taking the law into its own hands, it has declared that no local lawyers
can defend terror-accused—all Muslims, incidentally. Yet, no action has been
taken against this patently illegal declaration. Says advocate Noor Mohammad,
who was viciously physically assaulted by lawyers in Dhar who sought to prevent
him for taking up the case of a Muslim who he says has been wrongly accused of
running a terrorist-training camp in a jungle near Dhar , 'This is an alarming
development, an indication of how widespread Hindutva sentiments have become.
They indiscriminately brand Muslims as terrorists and presume them guilty even
before proper investigations have been made. At the same time, no action is
taken against the RSS when it openly declares that it will take up arms. It's
as if India's
laws do not apply to them.'
In April 2008, Noor Mohammad travelled to Dhar to defend the accused, but at
the gate of the court he was assaulted by a group of lawyers and activists of
the BJP youth wing and was badly beaten up. 'I told the judge about this', he
says. ' I told him that the life of the accused might also be in danger and
requested that the case be transferred elsewhere. The judge told the lawyers
who were beating me to leave the court premises. He repeated this three times
but they refused to listen. Instead, they kept laughing, as if to say that they
had no respect for the court. And the judge did not write all this down.' To
add insult to injury, when he approached the local police, they threatened him.
'They told me that I must say that I don't want to take any action against the
lawyers and that I was not hurt.'
When, some days later, Noor Mohammad returned to Dhar he was again beaten up by
BJP youth activists, this time so badly that he fell unconscious. 'A Hindu boy
helped me by putting me into an auto-rickshaw and taking me to the police
station. The hapless local Muslims are just too terrified to speak out, fearing
that they will be branded as terrorists or terrorist-sympathisers if they do', he
The same fate befell Lucknow-based lawyer Muhammad Shoeb, who has taken up
seven cases of Muslims accused of being terrorists across Uttar Pradesh—in Rampur, Lucknow,
Barabanki and Faizabad. 'The Faizabad Bar Association declared that no lawyers would
be allowed to defend any terror-accused, and so, when I travelled to Faizabad
to take up the case of Maulana Hakim Muhammad Tariq Qasmi, who has been accused
in some terror-related case, I was badly beaten up by lawyers inside the court.
The judge said nothing and the police refused to register my complaint.' 'They
are trying every means to sabotage the judicial system', he goes on, 'but I
will continue fighting the cases I have taken up despite their efforts to
Muhammad Shoeb believes that in scores of cases across the country, Muslim
youth have been deliberately and wrongly implicated by the police in acts of
terror. 'As I see it, Hindu communalists and powerful elements in the state
apparatus are hell-bent on unleashing such terror on Muslims that they are
actually forced to take to terror so that, in this way, they can justify a
concerted campaign to clamp down on the entire community', he says. While, as
in Faizabad, several Hindu lawyers are firmly behind the local Bar Association's
decision not to allow any lawyer to defend Muslims accused of being terrorists,
he says that some Hindu lawyers have supported him in his struggle. 'Many of
them are just too scared to speak out though', he points out, 'although when I
organised a press conference at the Uttar Pradesh Press Club in Lucknow, some Hindu
lawyers came to express their solidarity. A Hindu lawyer and I are jointly
fighting the case in Barabanki involving Maulana Tariq Qasmi and Khalid
Noor Mohammad and Muhammad Shoeb were among the several Muslim victims of
the state's 'war on terror' who came to testify recently at a public hearing
organised by a group of reputed human rights' activists at Hyderabad. At the hearing, numerous other
Muslims related similarly harrowing tales of being persecuted by the police and
by the state, besides Hindutva forces, of being wrongly branded as 'terrorists'
and of being falsely implicated in terror-related cases.
The situation is equally grim in states ruled by the BJP and the supposedly 'secular'
Congress. Says Latif Muhammad Khan, a social activist from Hyderabad, 'There
has been an alarming rise in fake encounters in Andhra Pradesh, where innocent
Muslims, Adivasis and Dalits are being gunned down by the police in the name of
countering terrorism and Naxalism, who are then rewarded for this. Deliberate
attempts are being made to destroy Muslim identity. For instance, Maulana
Nasiruddin from Hyderabad has been languishing
in a jail in Gujarat without any trial—his
only 'fault' was that he had condemned the destruction of the Babri Masjid.'
Bomb-blasts which might have well been engineered by other forces are
wrongly blamed on Muslims, providing an excuse to the police to unleash terror
on Muslim localities, Khan says. A case in point—a blast in the Mecca Masjid in
which Khan argues, could surely not have been done by a Muslim. Several Muslims
were shot dead in cold-blood by the police in the wake of the blast in what can
only be called uncalled-for firing. Thereafter, scores of Muslims were arrested
and subjected to brutal torture and even abuse of their religion. 'They
tortured them so mercilessly that, unable to bear the pain, many of them have
forced to make false confessions. The situation is worse than in the Guantanamo Bay prison, but yet their voices are
silenced. Many Muslims are just too scared to protest, fearing that they will
also be branded as terrorists if they do' he relates. For daring to take up the
cases of these innocent Muslim victims of state terror, Khan has been falsely
implicated in a terror case. 'The police have said that I should be killed in a
fake encounter', he says.
Reflecting the general sentiment of the dozens of Muslim victims assembled
at the public hearing, Noor Jehan Begum, a social activist from Gujarat, remarked, 'They want Muslims to be made into the
new untouchables. They want to grind us to dust, to make us their slaves so
that we cannot raise our heads and live with dignity.'
A grim story indeed of a community over 150 million strong under siege, and of
a system whose secular and democratic claims are increasingly being exposed as